Risk should only be managed for hazards not for internal and external issues, the needs and expectations of interested parties?

Risk should only be managed for hazards not for internal and external issues, the needs and expectations of interested parties?

No, It is a False statement, that Risk should only be managed for hazards not for internal and external issues, the needs and expectations of interested parties

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Give four examples of evidence which demonstrates that an organization is managing its OH&S legal responsibilities in conformance with ISO 45001.

Give four examples of evidence which demonstrates that an organization is managing its OH&S legal responsibilities in conformance with ISO 45001. Ans: The followings the examples of evidence to demonstrate that an organization is Managing its OH&S legal responsibilities in conformance with iso45001 1)     Document such as scope of management system or SMS has been identified established approved and implemented in the organization. 2)     Policy has been established implemented and being maintained by the top management showing organizations leadership and commitment towards OH&S of workers. 3)     OH&S Objectives goals and plans for achieving them has been established and cascaded to one and all in the lower hierarchy of the organization. 4)     OH&S process for addressing risk and opportunities as per clause 6.1.1 and methodology and criteria for assessment of OH&S risks (as per iso45001 Claus...
Read more

ISO 45001 requires that internal audits are objective and impartial.Describe the difference between objectivity and impartiality in this context.

ISO 45001 requires that internal audits are objective and impartial. Describe the difference between objectivity and impartiality in this context? Impartiality is about being neutral and fairly giving all sides an equal value without         bias. Objectivity is all about sticking to the observable facts without bias. They are both different methods for overcoming our personal bias. To understand the difference, imagine that you have two friends arguing over the nature of the earth. One is them insists that the earth is flat while the other claims that it is a sphere. If you are being impartial then you would give both arguments equal value. If you are being objective, you will tell one of them to stop being so stupid.
Read more